This probably my fourth
or fifth time reading this passage of Gawain and the Green Knight and I always
get a kick out of it.
There were a few
moments that really captured my attention. For example, the Green Knight was
surprised that no one took up his challenge (on lines 301-315). A giant green
man on a giant green horse burst into the great hall with no warning, issued
his challenge (which involves taking turns being hit with a huge sharp ax), and
he was surprised that the crowd hesitated? I would not be surprised if a few
knights suspected something.
<http://cdn.instanttrap.com/trap.jpg>
At least from my perspective, if some guy
bursts into my dining area and asks casually if I want to do something that
should kill him, and then afterwards he will get to do that thing to me, I’m
going to think some shenanigans are involved.
Although,
I don't know.... This guy looks trustworthy.
<http://api.ning.com/files/YT1pzXfaiucsJdwdca-ZO5Qv8ISow1CjJD2vT8pnUCDPXtRnl86QUgEehhbpEVP8hCQ0CLuNueI*KnuRabEfGpwdu-aNwxZq/knightimage.jpg>
On an even odder note,
after Gawain decapitates the Green Knight, and the Knight rides off carrying
his own still speaking head, King Arthur and Gawain just start laughing. On
lines 462-464 it reads "What thenne? / The Kyng and Gawen thare / at that
grene thay laghe and grene" or, in the translated version, it reads
"and then? / Well with the green man gone / they laughed and grinned
again." This part of the story just fascinates me. A giant green man came
out of nowhere, survived being beheaded thus spelling doom for Sir Gawain, and
everyone including Gawain just shrugs it off. Granted Arthur was a little
surprised, but that's it. According to the translation "Arthur was
awestruck at heart" (line 467). He is not worried or concerned for Gawain, Arthur was just
surprised. This must be the ultimate testament to the weird stuff that the
Knights of the Round Table deal with on a regular basis, because everyone’s
repose to this whole situation was essentially "Well... that just happened.
On with the feast!"
The
Green Knight probably seemed pretty strait forward when compared to this
anyway.
<
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Rabbitattack.jpg>
Overall
I think this passage, and the entire text in general, tends to reflect the idea
that in the late 14th century magic was not yet viewed as inherently
evil. When the knight first arrived, as unworldly as he appeared and armed with
a huge ax, Arthur’s first reaction (on lines 250-255) was to offer him a kind
greeting and hospitality. One does not usually respond this way to a person one
suspects could be an agent of evil. Even after the knight was decapitated, thus
demonstrating supernatural powers of some kind, no one shouts “sorcery!” and
goes to burn him. Instead, everyone had a good laugh at this remarkable
occurrence and got on with the feast.
Magic in this story
seemed to be treated as either a neutral force (neither inherently good nor
evil), or at the very worst magic was viewed as mischievous in nature. I believe
this because despite the fact that the Green Knight was clearly magical, he was
not treated as a force of evil. The Green Knight was actually treated very well
until he started to mock the honor of Arthur’s court. The Green Knight was
extended hospitality, allowed to issue his unusual challenge, and then leave
once the challenge was done without anyone trying to tie him to a stake and set
him on fire.
The
magical powers are one thing, but there is no excuse for poor table manners.
<http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Admin/BkFill/Default_image_group/2011/2/18/1298031677605/Tyndale-at-the-stake-007.jpg>
This is why I believe,
based on the text that we read, in the 14th century magic was not yet viewed as
inherently evil. On a closing note, I
invite you to witness the disembodied taking head of the Green Knight, as
played by Sean Connery in what seems to be a really cheesy film from the 1980’s.
This actually happened.
<http://image.toutlecine.com/photos/s/w/o/sword-of-the-valiant-1982-04-g.jpg>
To grow on you'r view of how magic was preserved, I believe peoples view was influenced and changed when the theory of Satan appeared. It wasn't until the 15th century that influential figures like Augustine heightened the awareness of evil forces (P.6, Kors and Peters).
ReplyDeleteI was also surprised that King Arthur and his knights' only reaction to this weird green guy that crashed their party was when he taunted them for not taking up his challenge, as you mentioned in your post. Magic was probably completely acceptable to them - their world would have probably felt very strange and different to them if there was no magic at all.
ReplyDelete