Showing posts with label hansel and Gretel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hansel and Gretel. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Back to the fairy tales

                I really like fairy tales and while I can’t exactly speak for why people still enjoy reading them after all this time, I know that I like them because the originals, at least, demonstrate a level of cruelty and brutality that isn’t found in modern versions of the same stories. That’s not to say the modern ones aren’t good, too, but the originals were more true to life, while still being fantastical, just in different ways. Real life is painful and bloody, and sometimes if you really want something you can’t have, you have to cut off your toe or your heel in order to fit into the role you want for yourself. Maybe that wasn’t the message I was supposed to get from Cinderella, but it does sound pretty true. People are willing to do ridiculous and painful things in order to get what they want. And sometimes you can do everything right, you can work really hard to get what you want, without hurting anyone in the process, and still be pushed off a tower by a witch and blinded by thorns. At least fairy tales leave you with the promise that, despite being blinded through no fault of your own other than making the wrong witch angry, maybe you can still find your princess (and newborn twins, oops) and live happily ever after. Metaphorically speaking, that is.
                Life sucks, and nobody could tell us that better than Hansel and Gretel, I think. Not only were they starving, but their stepmother obviously wanted them dead, ordering her husband—their father—to leave them in the woods to fend for themselves. And their father actually did it?! It seems unreal, but we see stories like this on the news all the time, with people who everyone says “would never hurt anyone” doing terrible things to each other, sometimes out of desperation, sometimes out of love, and sometimes because they are just honestly terrible people. This part of the story absolutely rings true. The part with the witch…well, yeah, it’s very unlikely you’re going to run into an edible house owned by a witch who wants to eat you, but their lives already pretty much sucked, so it’s not too surprising, within the story. As for the duck at the end, well, we discussed in class how they were lost and obviously couldn’t trust any adults in their lives, so a talking animal is the best guide they could have. And even despite all this, despite everything happening because their father couldn’t say no to his wife, couldn’t say, “Hey, these are my kids! How about I leave you in the woods instead?” they accept him when they return home. That’s a level of forgiveness I think I would like to have, even if it may seems silly and naïve.

                Speaking of silly and naïve, I think remembering that Snow White is 7 years old in the original story is really important. At 7, she is pure and innocent, but also young and naïve, which is how the queen was able to trick her several times. I think this story is as much about hospitality toward strangers than about not being an evil person or you’ll be forced to dance in hot iron shoes until you die (again, metaphorically). The dwarves are unendingly hospitable to Snow White, allowing her to stay in their house in return for cleaning, taking care of her by warning her not to open the door for anyone, and when they think she is dead, they make a beautiful coffin for her. They are under no obligation to do anything for her, but they do. Then we have Snow White, who tries to be hospitable in return to the old peddler woman (despite the dwarves’ warnings) and it backfires on her, multiple times. Is Snow White just a poor judge of character, or are the dwarves wrong to trust Snow White, simply based on the fact that she is a young girl? Maybe the fact that the old woman can’t be trusted more accurately illustrates how evil she is, that she takes advantage of Snow White’s hospitality, and tries to kill her anyway. Hospitality toward strangers was definitely valued in medieval society, so I can’t imagine that the story is conveying the message that strangers are not to be trusted. Even if she is naïve, Snow White’s kindness toward strangers is considered a virtue, and her goodness makes the queen seem that much more evil. In modern society, we definitely still have our “Snow Whites” and our “evil queens,” those people who are so good and pure that anyone who is mean to them (though hopefully not to the same extent) is seen as even worse in comparison to their goodness. Although I would say hospitality is still praised in modern society, we are also much more suspicious, to the extent that we can’t easily understand why Snow White would continue to trust an old peddler woman after being tricked several times. 

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

What The Hell Cinderella?

I thought the Brothers Grimm stories were certainly different to say the least. I thought it was crazy how far stretched out these versions were compared to the initial stories I was used to! For example, take the Hansel and Gretel story. At first glimpse, it seemed as though not much changed but after recalling the version I was used to I began to notice different small details. The version I was just used to Hansel and Gretel only dropped bread, not pebbles as well. I also did not recall from the version I was used to the part where there was a step-mother who was essentially a big jerk and convinced the father, her husband, to ditch the kids in the woods because they were so poor and hungry. The way I remember it, they siblings initially just got lost in the woods or something along those lines. After the beginning, some parts of the story seemed recognizable- even towards the end. HOWEVER, I was very thrown off at the ending involving the duck used to get across the lake. I had absolutely NEVER heard of that ending to Hansel and Gretel. But it does seem to make sense, considering they siblings wanted to use the duck as a symbol of guidance to get across the lake and make it home. That was certainly interesting. As far as the stories come, Hansel and Gretel was not too bad. I will say that the Brothers Grimm version of Cinderella is all types of screwed up! Some changes I noted first off in the story, the father was not dead- in fact he was a jerk for allowing the stepmother and stepsisters to gang up on his daughter and even give her the name Cinderella. Moving on in the story, we saw consistencies in Brothers Grimm version to Disney, where the stepmother and stepsisters were jerks and did not want to let Cinderella go to the ball. However, in Brothers Grimm- the ball lasted for 3 consecutive days.....they really knew how to party I suppose! Cinderella also got her dress from a hazelnut tree so in Brothers Grimm it was interesting not to see a fairy godmother aspect. Can we just examine the part where the princes on the third day of the ball tries to trap Cinderella by putting a sticky substance on the stairs to make her feet stick. What the hell?! So she loses the shoe....obviously. Thus, when the prince arrives at the family's home to try on the shoes of all the ladies, the stupid stepsisters are told by their mother to cut off their heel and big toe to make their feet fit the shoe so they can become queens. UM WHAT?! Then of course, he finds Cinderella and it all works out because her foot fits....but wait it's not over......at their wedding the stepsisters get their eyes pecked out by birds. Seriously?
 


Jessica Morales' Post #1 of 5