Thursday, December 12, 2013

HAPPILY EVER AFTER!

 I’m attempting to put a study guide together of sample passages from each of our readings on the exam; it’s a work in process. Reading over all of the past things, it just has me thinking about how much my thought of magic has changed from the beginning of class to the end. At first I really didn’t think of the in-depth thought of actual magic throughout the ages. Of course Harry Potter and Gandalf were the first two people I thought of when I heard magic, but they’re only characters in a more modern version of magic. Just from reading from Khors and Peters or of the four mystics, my perception has changed. Could magic just be a science that we don’t understand yet? If that is the case I definitely think we have already started to understand it more and more. The technology and medicine that we have in today’s world is seriously magical. It may not seem like to us, but if you honestly think about it there is something there. Just imagine going back to the time of the massacre in Trier Germany and bringing one of our IPads with us. There is no doubt we would have been burnt at the stake instantly with such witchcraft. What if we told them we had a cure for numerous diseases that usually kill off thousands? They wouldn’t believe our “satanic” lies.
We have so much magic in our daily lives from technology, science, or even the power of a higher being. I never really acknowledged it until this class. Whenever I get the chance I brag about this class because it is honestly the coolest one I’ve ever heard of. Most people are so jealous to hear that I got to read Harry Potter for a college level class, which of course was COMPLETELY awesome. However, the thing the people won’t understand is the absolute thought that went into this class. We did indeed read some tough pieces, but I think we mastered it. I’m sad that the class is over because fantasy is something that is one of my top interests when it comes to books and movies. But you better believe I will be using this class as a hot topic for my next job interview.

“All we can do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us.”
–Gandalf, Lord of the Rings

This was my quote in my senior yearbook. It is by far my favorite quote ever.

Warning: Feminist rant below

It's what I do best!



After talking about why there is no real female equivalent to the bearded male wizard who is more powerful than everyone else and acts as a mentor to the hero of the story, I wanted to find some sort of character archetype that could match. Unfortunately, almost every powerful female magic user in the most famous stories of magic seem to be evil. It’s unfortunate, but I guess it goes back to misogyny (doesn’t everything, really?) and is a reflection of just how far society hasn’t come since the days of accusing random women of being witches. Sorry to go off on a feminist rant, but no, I’m actually not sorry.

I tend to prefer fantasy books, but I’ve unfortunately been disappointed by most fantasy novels intended for adults, because they typically tend to feature male protagonists. No offense to male characters or men in general, but to be honest…God, I am sick of you. I’m not being completely serious but it seems like authors who write fantasy novels with female protagonists are encouraged to write only young adult fiction, not adult fiction, because of the mistaken belief that women don’t read fantasy or science fiction (both of which are, incidentally, my favorite genres. Hmm.). It’s kind of sad that even in fantasy, where magic is an equalizer, when theoretically, anyone can be powerful, even if they lack physical strength, women are still seen as somehow lesser. It’s fantasy, and yet even in fantasy it’s hard to find someone to identify with. I’m not saying I can’t identify with male characters, because I’ve had to my entire life, but it’s because I’ve had to identify with male characters my entire life that it frustrates me so much to be unable to find female representation.

Hermione is great, but she’s not the lead. McGonagall is amazing too, but she’s not Dumbledore. And this is a young adult series. When I do find even young adult series with female protagonists in a fantasy environment, there are almost always stupid love triangles, making the book primarily a romance novel, rather than a book of fantasy. Even my favorite author falls victim to the dreaded love triangle sometimes (although she’s gotten way better about that over the years; there is still romance, yes, but at least the love triangles are gone). Women like romance novels, I guess? Is that all we’re supposed to read? I don’t understand that mindset. Men are expected to have diverse interests and are encouraged to be enthusiastic about “nerdy” things, and women…we like pink. And…romance. I like pink, but there is way more to me than that, and I’m not a fan of romance novels at all. 

This isn’t a problem exclusive to fantasy, but it is a problem with society, that there is a double standard even in novels. Authors are, of course, under no obligation to write something they don’t want to write, but it makes me really sad to think of how easily a male protagonist could be changed to a female, with no distinct differences between them, and how rarely it actually happens. And it seems especially unjust in a genre featuring magic, where all genders should be equal…but they aren’t.

(And if my math is correct, this should finally be 3,000 words)

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Dumbledore and Gandalf

In my opinion, Dumbledore was a much better wizard than Gandalf.  I'm not saying Gandalf is a poor wizard though, he just isn't on the same level as Dumbledore.  Gandalf's main role in The Lord of the Rings was as a leader during role.  He pretty much directed troops on when and where to go.  He also fought along side with them.  But he never seemed to really use that much magic.  I mean shouldn't a wizard be use a good amount of magic? He did use his powers much more in the first movie than in the second and third movies.  In the second and third movies he played more of a war leader role.

But Dumbledore was always ready to use his magic.  He used his magic to defend Harry from the inferi, defeat Grindlewald, when he defended himself against the five ministry of magic workers in the fifth book, and he could defend himself from Voldemort unlike everyone else apart from Harry.  Dumbledore was also a great leader in battle and out of battle, just like Gandalf.

My decision is not made purely on use of magic though, leadership plays role but they are pretty much even in those categories.  I think that Dumbledore is more wise than Gandalf.  He was able to guide Harry to the right answer and give him the right piece of advice more often than Gandalf was able to give to Frodo.  Dumbledore did not blatantly tell Harry things though.  He would make riddles out of it or tell Harry stories or show him memories and Harry would have to find the answer from them.  Whereas Gandalf pretty much told Frodo he had to go to mt. doom in Mordor to destroy the ring and good luck doing it.  I do recognize that Gandalf could not escort Frodo all the way there and help him more but if he did that would ruin the story line.  So Dumbledore wins there.  And that is why I think Dumbledore is the better wizard.  What do you guys think?

Back to the fairy tales

                I really like fairy tales and while I can’t exactly speak for why people still enjoy reading them after all this time, I know that I like them because the originals, at least, demonstrate a level of cruelty and brutality that isn’t found in modern versions of the same stories. That’s not to say the modern ones aren’t good, too, but the originals were more true to life, while still being fantastical, just in different ways. Real life is painful and bloody, and sometimes if you really want something you can’t have, you have to cut off your toe or your heel in order to fit into the role you want for yourself. Maybe that wasn’t the message I was supposed to get from Cinderella, but it does sound pretty true. People are willing to do ridiculous and painful things in order to get what they want. And sometimes you can do everything right, you can work really hard to get what you want, without hurting anyone in the process, and still be pushed off a tower by a witch and blinded by thorns. At least fairy tales leave you with the promise that, despite being blinded through no fault of your own other than making the wrong witch angry, maybe you can still find your princess (and newborn twins, oops) and live happily ever after. Metaphorically speaking, that is.
                Life sucks, and nobody could tell us that better than Hansel and Gretel, I think. Not only were they starving, but their stepmother obviously wanted them dead, ordering her husband—their father—to leave them in the woods to fend for themselves. And their father actually did it?! It seems unreal, but we see stories like this on the news all the time, with people who everyone says “would never hurt anyone” doing terrible things to each other, sometimes out of desperation, sometimes out of love, and sometimes because they are just honestly terrible people. This part of the story absolutely rings true. The part with the witch…well, yeah, it’s very unlikely you’re going to run into an edible house owned by a witch who wants to eat you, but their lives already pretty much sucked, so it’s not too surprising, within the story. As for the duck at the end, well, we discussed in class how they were lost and obviously couldn’t trust any adults in their lives, so a talking animal is the best guide they could have. And even despite all this, despite everything happening because their father couldn’t say no to his wife, couldn’t say, “Hey, these are my kids! How about I leave you in the woods instead?” they accept him when they return home. That’s a level of forgiveness I think I would like to have, even if it may seems silly and naïve.

                Speaking of silly and naïve, I think remembering that Snow White is 7 years old in the original story is really important. At 7, she is pure and innocent, but also young and naïve, which is how the queen was able to trick her several times. I think this story is as much about hospitality toward strangers than about not being an evil person or you’ll be forced to dance in hot iron shoes until you die (again, metaphorically). The dwarves are unendingly hospitable to Snow White, allowing her to stay in their house in return for cleaning, taking care of her by warning her not to open the door for anyone, and when they think she is dead, they make a beautiful coffin for her. They are under no obligation to do anything for her, but they do. Then we have Snow White, who tries to be hospitable in return to the old peddler woman (despite the dwarves’ warnings) and it backfires on her, multiple times. Is Snow White just a poor judge of character, or are the dwarves wrong to trust Snow White, simply based on the fact that she is a young girl? Maybe the fact that the old woman can’t be trusted more accurately illustrates how evil she is, that she takes advantage of Snow White’s hospitality, and tries to kill her anyway. Hospitality toward strangers was definitely valued in medieval society, so I can’t imagine that the story is conveying the message that strangers are not to be trusted. Even if she is naïve, Snow White’s kindness toward strangers is considered a virtue, and her goodness makes the queen seem that much more evil. In modern society, we definitely still have our “Snow Whites” and our “evil queens,” those people who are so good and pure that anyone who is mean to them (though hopefully not to the same extent) is seen as even worse in comparison to their goodness. Although I would say hospitality is still praised in modern society, we are also much more suspicious, to the extent that we can’t easily understand why Snow White would continue to trust an old peddler woman after being tricked several times. 

Dumbledore or Gandalf Ultimate showdown?

Hello everyone, so the other night at dinner I am sitting in the dining hall discussing this class with my friends. We were totally nerding out and began to debate the ultimate topic:
Who would win in a fight Gandalf or Dumbledore?
We were completely divided down the middle between the two wizards. Does anyone wish to express their side? Our main arguments were (*based solely on the movies*) :


                Pro Dumbledore
                1. He is knowledgeable on most things magic, whereas Gandalf had to go and do research.
                2. He had the power to do the death spell the ultimate curse.
                3. Dumbledore was in possession of the elder wand the most powerful of the wands.
                4. Dumbledore was able to touch his evil ring (the horcrux) granted it was slowly killing him…..Gandalf could not touch the ring.


                Pro Gandalf
1.       He was always in the midst of battle. He fought orcs, and goblins.
2.       (as my brother likes to quote) He fell through fire and water and fought the Balrog on the highest peak of the lowest dungeon and won.
3.       What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. On the other hand, in Gandalf’s case, what kills you makes you stronger and you come back with a mission and are more powerful than ever.
Personally I am for Dumbledore, because I am not convinced that if Gandalf got hit with that forbidden curse he would come back again….Any opinions?
…..or should we just toss them both aside and crown the winner doe-y eyed Merlin?



Blog 4 of 5

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

The Greatness of Gandolf

 
           I grew up with Gandalf. I grew up watching the old animated Rankin and Bass Hobbit movie, the Rankin and Bass The Return of the King (they did not do any of the others, and it was really confusing because they just kind of dumped you in with Sam trying to rescue Frodo from imprisonment deep in Mordor without much context). I read The Hobbit for the first time in Middle-School and enjoyed every moment of it. I have seen all of the movies so far and I have played many of the video games.
I have no idea how Pippin became the second most powerful character I got in "The Return of the King" game, but he killed everything.

           While I am not incredibly knowledgeable in Middle-Earth lore, I really do enjoy the stories. They have also played a major role in shaping how I view fantasy and wizards. Maybe this sets me apart, but when I hear wizard I don't think of Merlin, or Dumbledore, or Harry Potter. I picture this guy.

"Balrog! You made me loose my hat. I will sword you to death!!!!" 

          Gandalf is the quintessential good wizard for me. He is incredibly intelligent, learned, wise, magical, and willing to use his talents to advise others and to aid the greater good. Also the beard.

          Furthermore, despite all of his achievements Gandalf still goes out into the world and with his boots on the ground to resolve problems. He helped guild the Fellowship in person, he fought the Balrog, and he killed what scientists have officially declared to be "a metric-hoard" of goblins/orcs. Gandalf was with the fight almost the whole time. When Gandalf did disappear from the story it was usually because he was going out to study so everyone could know what was going on, he was finding reinforcements, or he was confronting darkness somewhere else. And, if he was not doing any of those things then he was coming back to life!

Death, the destroyer of worlds, is but a minor setback for this man.
http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121003055425/lotr/images/4/4f/Gandalf_the_White_returns.png

          So that is really all I have to say. I think Gandalf is awesome, and I view Gandalf as the poster-wizard for magic. Oh, and in case anyone is wondering who the most powerful character in The Return of the King game was, it was Gandalf... because of course it was!

Gandalf: "I don't even use magic half of the time. It's just more sporting that way."

Sunday, December 8, 2013

side note about Harry Potter

I always liked Harry Potter. The movies attract all generations. There is lust, magic, good vs. evil, and anticipation. I loved how there where times the audience knew more than the characters. Unlike other famous works like Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter provides an alternate world that every person daydreamed about when they were children.
http://www.fordhamobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Features_HarryPotter.jpg
The books are so detailed to the point where you feel as if you are standing next to Harry Potter. You get to know enough about each character, which keeps the readers hooked and the audience starts to pick favorites.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RJB_J-xAYCI/UM0VBx9iNxI/AAAAAAAA
DOc/9QC4WTL5K_A/s1600/animaatjes-lord-of-the-rings-73676.jpg
Lord of the Rings is focuses more on the current situation and the ring. Twilight mainly became popular because readers got to learn about the characters which allowed them to connect and become attached. I believe Harry Potter is very popular because it is based off fantasies this century has created. This movie brings child's make-believe stories alive and brings out our inner child. Lord of the Rings was very popular because the books came out right after a war and this good vs. evil plot is exactly what the people of that decade wanted. The pasted few decades the audiences interest have changed and this is one reason why Harry Potter was able to be this successful.








blog post #6