Saturday, October 5, 2013

My answers to the class discussions.

In Chapter VII of Kors and Peters, our wonderfully talented classmates posed the question: If God is the source of all the magic then how can magic be considered blasphemous? Which by the way I think is a really great question and if you guys have a thing or two to say about it please feel free to comment!

I feel like it is the way you use the magic powers that makes it good or bad or neutral. For example, Jesus did many miracles that showed the power of God like make the dead come back to life, cure diseases, turn water to wine and etc... But i feel like because Jesus was the son of God and everybody knew that, they considered that a miracle because Jesus didn't like kill people with his powers and he could actually perform these miracles in front of people as proof. Now if people did not know he was the son of God, like if Jesus just appeared out of nowhere and started doing this then I feel like the people would have said otherwise.
So then when you compare it to this time period (the early 1500's), I think that the people were too quick to judge the ones that were blamed with sorcery. Did they have solid proof that the ones being accused of sorcery or heresy were killing babies and people? Like did they see with their own eyes or as a mass of group? I don't think so. I feel like they were just going off on speculation and lies and rumors of what they heard from other people. And since the things that they heard were blasphemous, they were conditioned to think like this from their early childhood to their adult life which affected how they lived their lives. For example, the sorcery detected at Orleans was just from a letter that someone wrote and I don't consider that as enough evidence for sorcery. I need to see the evil magic with my own eyes!

To them magic was considered blasphemous because they were conditioned to think that way and no one dared to say the opposite. Also because they considered that the power did not come from God like it did to Jesus. To incorporate Olivia's last blog question "why did the mid evil folks killed their own kin?" I just think they were too scared to go against their society and the conformity that was going on at the time. I also think it was kind of too late by that time to turn back and even if they knew that killing was wrong and that there was no such thing as evil magic killing babies and humans and livestock, there was nothing they could do and say or they will be killed as well so they sadly just let people die.    

              


5 comments:

  1. I also think that part of it is that they had to go on faith with a lot of things like religion and healing. People in modern days have more of a "I'll believe it when I see it" mentality that I think we get from the Scientific Age. We like proof when back then, they saw what they wanted to see. Therefore, if you think the old woman down the road is a wicked witch, then you might watch her and see things that are completely innocent but that you might twist around to be sorcery. For example (and this is completely made up), if you see her muttering to herself while she's gardening, then you might think that she's saying spells to make her plants grow and cause others' crops to die. That was probably a bad example, but my point is that it is easy to see what you want to see. They weren't really taught to question things like we are today. They weren't really taught to question things scientifically like we are today, but rather they look to the Church and God.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the fact that anyone even considered using magic made them evil because it does come from God. People of this time believed that only God should create miracles. If God did not grant you something, then you did not need it enough to make it on your own. Using God's powers for your own advantage was blasphemous because God is the one who decides how His magic is used.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If that is the case, then why were other practices still performed by the church not frowned upon. Many saints did things that were considered magical (or miraculous) and were praised for it, even though the magic wasn't done by God. It was done by a mortal with God's power.
      The real difference seems to come from where the magic is derived from - the Devil or God.

      Delete
  3. I think that magic can be considered blasphemous when it is being used in the wrong way or by the wrong persons. Saints have to have performed miracles and they certainly are not blasphemous. People who use magic to summon the devil and demons are certainly using it the wrong way and blaspheming god.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I definitely agree with Michael, in this case. Saints are revered for doing something pious and worthy of being deemed so. You never saw these revered saints going around and trying to resurrect demons from the Munich Handbook, did you? No.

    ReplyDelete